Classical realism and neorealism in the theory of international relations: comparative characteristics
Keywords:
neorealism; structural realism; classical realism; system; anarchyAbstract
This study compares and contrasts neorealism with classical realism, describes its main provisions and innovations in the realistic tradition.
References
Morgenthau H. Politics Among Nations. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. 1956. P. 752.
Mearsheimer J. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: Norton. 2001. P. 592.
Jackson R. and Sorensen G. Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches. New York: Oxford University Press. 2007. P. 337.
Buzan B. ‘The Timeless Wisdom of Realism?’. In International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, edited by Steve Smith, Ken Booth and Marysia Zalewski. London: Cambridge University Press. 1997. P. 380.
Waltz K. Theory of International Politics. United States: McGraw-Hill. 1979. P. 256.
Waltz, Kenneth N. The Origins of War in Neorealist Theory. Journal of Interdisciplinary History. Vol.18 1988. P. 615–628.
Shimko K. Realism, Neorealism, and American Liberalism. The Review of Politics. 54. 1992. P. 281–301.
Waltz K. Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press. 1959. P. 263.
Hobson J. The State and International Relations. London: Cambridge University Press. 2000. P. 268.
Schweller R. Neorealism’s Status-Quo Bias: What Security Dilemma?. Security Studies. 5. 1996. P. 90–121.
Weber C. International Relations Theory: A critical introduction. 2nd edition. NY: Taylor and Francis eLibrary. 2005. P. 224.
